Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170929
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 20 '17 at 15:27
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 77.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 931
83% 699 Pts
64-Core 2,503
155% 2,503 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
Asus(1043 0468) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 56.3
Parallax 76.1
51% 65.1 fps
MRender 55.7
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 71.2
50% 59.1 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
260GB free
Firmware: 8EV101H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,867
Write 979
Mixed 1,319
306% 1,388 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 40.5
194% 78.5 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 105
113% 188 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 203%
Great: 230%
Samsung MZFLV256HCHP-000MV 256GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV71MT0
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 968
Write 260
Mixed 385
117% 538 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 19.8
142% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 103
103% 165 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 104%
Great: 138%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 97.8
Mixed 89.7
72% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.43
4K Mixed 0.29
114% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
549GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 81.9
Write 79.2
Mixed 79.3
60% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.2
76% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST3000DM001-9YN166 2TB
481GB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 114
Write 129
Mixed 88.6
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 7.66
4K Mixed 0.54
231% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 104%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
87GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 52.9
Write 49.1
Mixed 56.6
40% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.19
59% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
158% Outstanding
MC Read 64.8
MC Write 63.4
MC Mixed 58.8
178% 62.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 27.6
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 158%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $918
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback