| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock Q1900M (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140521 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 20 '17 at 13:10 |
| Run Duration | 103 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron J1900
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
39.7%
Below average
|
32% 44.3 Pts
|
12% 90.3 Pts
|
6% 89.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Radeon HD 5400
Sapphire(174B 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
|
1.16%
Terrible
|
1% 1.64 fps
|
1% 1.49 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA50E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
71.6%
Very good
|
94% 124 MB/s
|
84% 0.78 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.9%
Poor
|
29% 10.3 GB/s
|
12% 4.37 GB/s
|
35% 116 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Q1900M Builds (Compare 201 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Q1900M
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples | 131x |
| R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 8x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |