Asus Rampage III Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Rampage III Formula (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '17 at 17:36
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Memory 97.5 1-Core 107 2-Core 213 81% 139 Pts	4-Core 405 8-Core 539 60% 472 Pts	64-Core 540 33% 540 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 3692) 2GB CLim: 1631 MHz, MLim: 1777 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Lighting 52.9 Reflection 48.3 Parallax 42.9 43% 48 fps	MRender 40 Gravity 44.6 Splatting 39.6 34% 41.4 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90 17,487 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 339GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1921 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 625 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 11 (AE) Unknown 100 100 31 (B4) Unknown 0 0 5576 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 73 68 137439543323 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 12316712267 (F7) Unknown 100 100 384956082 (F8) Unknown 100 100 45781578	47% Average	Read 376 Write 195 Mixed 232 59% 267 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 24.1 4K Mixed 19.6 59% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 14.3 DQ Write 43.2 DQ Mixed 8.79 12% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 105%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 82GB free Firmware: 0007 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 36644 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2558 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 156 (AE) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 9341601449384 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 189 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 97 97 3 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	37.4% Below average	Read 356 Write 135 Mixed 193 50% 228 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 28.2 4K Mixed 3.74 42% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 14.7 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 3.55 23% 48.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 62%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 328GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 198 197 1892 (03) Spinup time 181 173 3950 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13857 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 54 54 33718 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2666 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 295 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 13561 (C2) HDA temperature 117 107 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 197 3 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 198 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 195 34	57.3% Above average	Read 129 Write 71 Mixed 93.5 74% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.28 96% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63.3% Good	MC Read 23.8 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 22.6 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 18.1 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 48.3 83% 48.3 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Rampage III Formula Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 53%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Rampage III Formula

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	70x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	54x
Core i7 X 980Intel $148Bench 76%, 8,133 samples	34x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	31x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	16x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	15x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	21x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	9x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	50x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	44x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16