Nagem Favorito

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	9.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Nagem Favorito (all builds)
Memory	6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101020
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '17 at 15:01
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 540-$60 24,563 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 70.4 1-Core 75.6 2-Core 145 57% 97 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 194 26% 195 Pts	64-Core 195 12% 195 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250E 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E213) 1GB CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.10.1 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	9.11% Terrible	Lighting 9.83 Reflection 12.2 Parallax 11 8% 11 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 10.5 Splatting 17.1 11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.11% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 806GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 71 70 9069 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6062 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9257 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6295 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 96 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 54 201864708122 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 52 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 6301	72.9% Very good	Read 129 Write 125 Mixed 118 93% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.97 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.42 115% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 75%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 230GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 139 136 2016 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9903 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4177 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1177 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 404 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 216 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 803394 (C2) HDA temperature 115 97 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 53 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	35% Below average	Read 65.4 Write 56.4 Mixed 30.4 37% 50.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.2 72% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 47%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50 10,446 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 99GB free Firmware: AX001A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1062 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2938 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 7026 (0A) Spinup retry count 158 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2413 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 11 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 329 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 34040 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 188980002845 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 71 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 94 94 2778 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 268 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	37.8% Below average	Read 67.4 Write 64.4 Mixed 61.4 48% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.19 60% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 54%
Kingston SV100S232G 32GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 120503s Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1700 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1851 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 44 100 188980985900 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 3538978 (AD) Unknown 100 100 8682931139	51.5% Above average	Read 133 Write 44.2 Mixed 37.1 52% 71.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.68 4K Write 1.13 4K Mixed 0.02 343% 2.94 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 0, 0 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	29.9% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 12.9 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 8.1 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Nagem Favorito

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)