| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible. |
| Graphics | 1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5KPL (all builds) |
| Memory | 1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20091111 |
| Uptime | 3.7 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 19 '17 at 10:15 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 46% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$130
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
6.88%
Terrible
|
7% 10.7 Pts
|
3% 21 Pts
|
1% 12.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
Asus(1043 825C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
|
1.82%
Terrible
|
2% 2.32 fps
|
2% 2.43 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
28.8%
Poor
|
40% 177 MB/s
|
32% 8.89 MB/s
| |
|
|
58.6%
Above average
|
55% 75.9 MB/s
|
74% 0.84 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
4.93%
Terrible
|
4% 1.57 GB/s
|
4% 1.37 GB/s
|
10% 403 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5KPL Builds (Compare 51 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5KPL
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 17x |
| Core2 Duo E6550Intel $15Bench 37%, 11,349 samples | 5x |
| Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 9600 GSONvidiaBench 5%, 1,167 samples | 10x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 4x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |