ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion NY599AAR-ABA e9237c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Hp-pavilion NY599AAR-ABA e9237c (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Eureka3
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100113
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '17 at 00:01
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38 10,428 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Memory 77.1 1-Core 35.7 2-Core 71.7 42% 61.5 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 142 19% 141 Pts	64-Core 133 8% 133 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% MSI(1462 1603) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	3.37% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 6.23 Parallax 2.91 3% 4.45 fps	MRender 3.57 Gravity 3.13 Splatting 4.91 3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.37% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB 7,970 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: D781 Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 117 Write 95.2 Mixed 72.9 71% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.17 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.55 291% 3.01 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 98%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 414GB free (System drive) Firmware: ST6OA39D Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 74 0 (02) Throughput performance 130 100 121 (03) Spinup time 124 100 38683279847 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5290 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 131095 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 123 100 34 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 19761 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5268 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5303 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5303 (C2) HDA temperature 176 107 240519217186 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	46.1% Average	Read 80 Write 80.6 Mixed 79.6 60% 80.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.32 92% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 61%
MICRONET FANTOM DRIVE 1TB 344 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 29GB free, PID 1340 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 35.5 Write 36 Mixed 19.4 38% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.44 96% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.7 20% 7.07 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.3 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 86.2 46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback