Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '17 at 17:03
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 140
2-Core 279
96% 172 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 780
76% 627 Pts
64-Core 782
48% 782 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 116
Parallax 107
89% 111 fps
MRender 93.1
Gravity 99.1
Splatting 83.6
74% 91.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
619GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 408
Mixed 419
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 58
193% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 135
154% 265 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
502GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 398
Mixed 417
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 53.5
190% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 131
152% 264 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
502GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 407
Mixed 425
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 33.1
156% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 138
156% 267 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Crucial_ CT2050MX30 2TB
352GB free
Firmware: M0C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 481
Write 338
Mixed 335
85% 385 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 25.4
116% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 24.4
80% 175 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$138
2.5TB free
Firmware: DN01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 111%
Seagate Desktop HDD 5TB (2015)-$634
2TB free
Firmware: CC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 170
Mixed 25.4
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.52
4K Mixed 0.46
121% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4B8G2J3000K15K 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 31.7
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 31.9
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 51.3
78% 51.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 13,902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback