Asrock 990FX Extreme9

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Extreme9 (all builds)
Memory	29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20160329
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '17 at 00:51
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 89.1 1-Core 78.6 2-Core 143 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 251 8-Core 426 41% 339 Pts	64-Core 459 28% 459 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	Lighting 143 Reflection 151 Parallax 130 117% 142 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 133 Splatting 111 98% 120 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.r Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4417 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2793 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 608 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4063322 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 5898302 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 702 (C2) HDA temperature 70 62 163209936926 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 98 (E9) Unknown 100 100 14421 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 12049 (F2) Unknown 100 100 11594 (F4) Unknown 100 100 62 (F5) Unknown 100 100 90 (F6) Unknown 100 100 4292352	75.4% Very good	Read 485 Write 452 Mixed 471 105% 469 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 46.7 4K Mixed 10.8 70% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 10.9 56% 126 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 111%
Samsung 650 120GB 2,684 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 77GB free Firmware: FXT01B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4742 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2996 (B1) Unknown 97 97 62 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 57 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 656 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19875223633	80.6% Excellent	Read 484 Write 409 Mixed 452 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 64.6 4K Mixed 21.5 102% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 85.2 DQ Mixed 51.6 60% 106 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 84%
WD Se 1TB (2013)-$18 2,236 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 730GB free Firmware: 01.01M03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 172 2266 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4739 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 3707 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2450 (10) Unknown 3 197 64379793022 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 523 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4215 (C2) HDA temperature 115 100 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	82.1% Excellent	Read 149 Write 137 Mixed 139 107% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 3.09 4K Mixed 0.17 147% 1.65 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 104%
WD Se 1TB (2013)-$18 2,236 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 696GB free Firmware: 01.01M03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 172 2233 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4839 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 3757 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2487 (10) Unknown 2 198 40292114398 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 522 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4316 (C2) HDA temperature 115 103 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	105% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 169 Mixed 165 133% 177 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 2.76 4K Mixed 0.17 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB 1,536 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.6% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 18 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 13.7 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	48x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	27x
FX-9370AMD $194Bench 62%, 9,054 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples	5x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	5x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
PM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 2,882 samples	4x

RAM
BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. CT51264BA160BJ.C8F BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 16GBUnknownBench 29%, 10 samples	4x
Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 58%, 5,634 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $642

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16