Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results


Gaming 105% UFO	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 113% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170914
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '17 at 23:06
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$462 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 72.2 1-Core 126 2-Core 248 81% 149 Pts	4-Core 487 8-Core 881 82% 684 Pts	64-Core 1,635 101% 1,635 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 387.92 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	124% Outstanding	Lighting 173 Reflection 190 Parallax 168 141% 177 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 162 Splatting 120 109% 135 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HPT DISK 0_1 8TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 11.5TB free Firmware: 4.00 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.5% Average	Read 361 Write 425 Mixed 238 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 2.16 4K Write 8.68 4K Mixed 0.89 9% 3.91 MB/s	DQ Read 9.32 DQ Write 15.1 DQ Mixed 1.59 4% 8.66 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 51%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 4,056 User benchmarks, average bench 250% 770GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXA7100Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	272% Outstanding	Read 2,166 Write 1,589 Mixed 1,721 406% 1,826 MB/s	4K Read 50.4 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 54.9 228% 86.5 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 507 DQ Mixed 237 232% 363 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 272% Great: 331%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 318GB free Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	353% Outstanding	Read 3,855 Write 1,739 Mixed 2,197 570% 2,597 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 159 4K Mixed 61.9 229% 87.9 MB/s	DQ Read 557 DQ Write 449 DQ Mixed 257 260% 421 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 353% Great: 283%
Samsung MZVKV512HAJH-000L1 512GB 1,391 User benchmarks, average bench 207% 318GB free Firmware: 7L0QBXX7 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	355% Outstanding	Read 3,890 Write 1,740 Mixed 2,181 572% 2,604 MB/s	4K Read 42.7 4K Write 158 4K Mixed 63 229% 88 MB/s	DQ Read 555 DQ Write 451 DQ Mixed 257 260% 421 MB/s
Poor: 134% ↑ This bench: 355% Great: 260%
Samsung PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 7,011 User benchmarks, average bench 140% 318GB free Firmware: BXV77D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	352% Outstanding	Read 3,852 Write 1,727 Mixed 2,200 570% 2,593 MB/s	4K Read 43.2 4K Write 159 4K Mixed 61.7 229% 88.1 MB/s	DQ Read 556 DQ Write 452 DQ Mixed 257 260% 422 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 352% Great: 172%
HPT DISK 0_0 20TB 11.5TB free Firmware: 4.00 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

WD Se 4TB-$177 2,519 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 509GB free Firmware: 01.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 136 10133 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 417 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5033 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 308 (10) Unknown 255 0 112174608203022 (B7) Unknown 1 1 202 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 275 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 141 (C2) HDA temperature 99 96 53 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	65.3% Good	Read 110 Write 117 Mixed 105 83% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.95 4K Mixed 0.25 118% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 51.2 MC Mixed 30 105% 36.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 10.1 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 96.3 42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

UFO

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 101%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	124x
Core i9-7900XIntel $462Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	88x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	97x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	30x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	22x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	15x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	13x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 241%, 38,097 samples	12x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	103x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	56x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $903

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16