Kanji KJ-HANA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemKanji KJ-HANA  (all builds)
MotherboardKANJI KJ-HANA
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160820
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 17 '17 at 22:23
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Memory 41.9
1-Core 15.8
2-Core 31.8
21% 29.8 Pts
4-Core 58.4
8-Core 59.8
8% 59.1 Pts
64-Core 60.1
4% 60.1 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.22% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.85
Parallax 2.03
1% 1.74 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 2.17
2% 1.75 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.22%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Generic NCard 31GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.9
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.9% Above average
Read 135
Write 70.6
Mixed 89.3
74% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.44
4K Write 3.24
4K Mixed 2.82
683% 4.5 MB/s
Generic SU04G SD Card 4GB
2GB free
Firmware: 8.0
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
5.09% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 4.54
Mixed 6.55
6% 7.52 MB/s
4K Read 4.38
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 1.02
315% 2.16 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.09%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 4.4
16% 5.43 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback