Toshiba SATELLITE C855-2FG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C855-2FG (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121205
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '17 at 15:12
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 81.9 2-Core 140 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 200 27% 199 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.69% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 5.38 Parallax 2.78 3% 4.08 fps	MRender 5.24 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 7.74 4% 5.08 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.69% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 317GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2555 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 173 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 55 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2841635553
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 47GB free Firmware: AX003M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1715 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3044 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 37 37 25538 (0A) Spinup retry count 160 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1612 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 895 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 46 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 83540 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 249108627491 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 45 45 22086 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 273 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	34.9% Below average	Read 52.8 Write 68.7 Mixed 71.1 49% 64.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.21 57% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU5-GN-F HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.2% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 17.7 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 15.8 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba SATELLITE C855-2FG

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)