PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 18E7 |
Memory | 6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20131217 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 17 '17 at 07:05 |
Run Duration | 89 Seconds |
Run User | ZAF-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
79.1%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 347.52
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$22
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP74 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
43.1%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
49.9%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 1,014x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 847x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 309x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 978x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 331x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 224x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $142 |