Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus X99-DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170330
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '17 at 06:31
Run Duration	313 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Memory 92.2 1-Core 107 2-Core 218 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 707 71% 575 Pts	64-Core 882 55% 882 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 3623) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.04% Terrible	Lighting 2.47 Reflection 2.77 Parallax 1.94 2% 2.39 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 2.22 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.04% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 822GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 179 (03) Spinup time 175 173 2233 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 343 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 15211 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 343 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 248 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 347 (C2) HDA temperature 112 101 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	88.5% Excellent	Read 145 Write 163 Mixed 157 117% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 0.12 109% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 42GB free Firmware: KC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 720 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 5040 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 48400928 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 14519 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 437 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 58 454754331 (C2) HDA temperature 27 42 94489280539 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 62 38 720 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 49413598747844 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3651745709 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1845002350	48.8% Average	Read 90 Write 80 Mixed 78.8 62% 82.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.45 88% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 88%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 6TB 120 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2TB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	67.9% Good	Read 160 Write 168 Mixed 176 220% 168 MB/s	4K Read 4.66 4K Write 2.31 4K Mixed 0.27 105% 2.41 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 83%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 9,084 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 270GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Read 69.1 Write 62.6 Mixed 61.5 82% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.2 58% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 160 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 34GB free, PID a00b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Read 63.7 Write 72.7 Mixed 49.9 80% 62.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.19 54% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 3,454 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 32GB free, PID a00d Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 59.7 Write 60.9 Mixed 56.5 76% 59.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.21 58% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 64GB 812 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 21GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 134 Write 23.2 Mixed 25.3 55% 60.7 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 0.95 4K Mixed 1.02 96% 3.25 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 30%
WD USB Elements Device 500GB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 5GB free, PID 6031 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 38.3 Write 39.4 Mixed 38.6 50% 38.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.16 53% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125 59,072 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.3% Very good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 24.3 72% 25 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 21.3 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	835x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	462x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	282x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	148x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	142x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	77x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	49x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $92Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $910

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16