Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 14 '17 at 15:55
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 96
2-Core 186
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 359
48% 357 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.6% Good
Lighting 81.6
Reflection 80.4
Parallax 70.1
66% 77.4 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 72.6
Splatting 73.2
58% 70.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 381
Write 314
Mixed 273
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 22.1
110% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 41.4
DQ Write 95
DQ Mixed 23.9
31% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
662GB free
Firmware: CC4D Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 134
Write 159
Mixed 76.7
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.31
91% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
88GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 87.7
Write 75.3
Mixed 60.4
92% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.16
51% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.6% Average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.3
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $225
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback