PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Gigabyte Default string |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20170609 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 14 '17 at 07:58 |
Run Duration | 303 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
80.3%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.10.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
59.2%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
82%
Excellent
|
|||
82.7%
Excellent
|
||||
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
7GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
4.8%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.6%
Good
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6950XIntel $499Bench 87%, 6,135 samples | 56x |
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples | 52x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 24x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 43x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 27x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $968 |