Lenovo 3259A3G

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 3259A3G (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 3259A3G
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160818
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '17 at 04:41
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Memory 80.7 1-Core 83.2 2-Core 153 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 175 23% 174 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M 7,774 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 5001) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5937 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	2.44% Terrible	Lighting 3.47 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 0.81 3% 2.72 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 2.04 2% 2.08 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.44% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 15 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 17 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 57 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 286230929	80% Excellent	Read 510 Write 413 Mixed 413 99% 445 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 28.7 105% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 31.1 DQ Write 65.8 DQ Mixed 18.1 22% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 124%
Sandisk U100 16GB 448 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 15GB free Firmware: CS.52.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7774 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 6118 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 65 (AE) Unknown 100 100 444 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 216 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 53 (F1) Unknown 100 100 8153183 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5538917	22.7% Poor	Read 234 Write 57.6 Mixed 93 28% 128 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 9.26 4K Mixed 4.61 32% 9.41 MB/s	DQ Read 15 DQ Write 7.77 DQ Mixed 4.58 5% 9.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-049.A00LF Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 18 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.4 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 3259A3G

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)