| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Performance (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160113 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 14 '17 at 00:21 |
| Run Duration | 183 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.9%
Good
|
60% 93.1 Pts
|
32% 252 Pts
|
19% 304 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
36.6%
Below average
|
39% 44.9 fps
|
32% 39.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 128GB-$110
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
111%
Outstanding
|
148% 684 MB/s
|
120% 43.4 MB/s
|
52% 73.7 MB/s
|
|
|
43.1%
Average
|
57% 75.4 MB/s
|
82% 0.88 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C8 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
|
54%
Above average
|
56% 19.5 GB/s
|
30% 10.4 GB/s
|
69% 58.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Performance Builds (Compare 57 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 20x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 15x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 12x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| R7 370AMD $153Bench 21%, 39,178 samples | 3x |
| HD 7870AMD $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples | 3x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $311 |