Acer Aspire E5-523

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation 19%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-523  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Wasp_SR
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '17 at 15:46
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD A9-9410 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
33.2% Below average
SC Int 79.7
SC Float 66.6
SC Mixed 73.2
59% 73.2 Pts
QC Int 147
QC Float 98.3
QC Mixed 129
28% 125 Pts
MC Int 142
MC Float 104
MC Mixed 130
19% 125 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Acer(1025 1099) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.101.1201.1007
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Lighting 12
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 17.2
4% 16.3 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 11.7
4% 10.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
658GB free
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 90
Mixed 53
60% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 4.47
4K Mixed 0.38
152% 1.84 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 1067 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Aspire E5-523 Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation 19%

System: Acer Aspire E5-523

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $81Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $141
Intel Core i5-8600K $235AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $170SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $51Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback