Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
6 days ago, 6 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '17 at 13:46
Run Duration69 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD A4-4000 APU-$36
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
23.5% Poor
SC Int 47.2
SC Float 52.6
SC Mixed 54.5
41% 51.4 Pts
QC Int 92.4
QC Float 82.4
QC Mixed 85.6
20% 86.8 Pts
MC Int 101
MC Float 86.3
MC Mixed 98.6
14% 95.4 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 26%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$50
921GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 164
Mixed 112
106% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.14
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.32
122% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown V01L3LF4GB268 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.7% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 25%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-F2A55M-S1 Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $113
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $220Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $163SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $842SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback