User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 16%
Desktop 16%
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardFOXCONN A7GM-S 2.0
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '17 at 13:44
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
Socket 940, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
SC Int 19.1
SC Float 11
SC Mixed 14.4
12% 14.8 Pts
QC Int 71.1
QC Float 29.6
QC Mixed 54.7
12% 51.8 Pts
MC Int 58.1
MC Float 33.5
MC Mixed 56.1
7% 49.2 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
MSI(1462 3030) 2GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.10.1
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Lighting 50.6
Reflection 60.8
Parallax 144
26% 85 fps
MRender 61.3
Gravity 94
Splatting 87.3
34% 80.9 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 39%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$16
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZM100-41 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 48.5
Write 58.1
Mixed 29
33% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.37
80% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $66Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $114
Intel Core i5-8600K $260AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $150SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $898SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $167SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback