Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.09% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory16.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130920
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 13 '17 at 11:56
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
63.9% Good
SC Int 93.6
SC Float 96.4
SC Mixed 94.5
76% 94.8 Pts
QC Int 303
QC Float 301
QC Mixed 304
69% 303 Pts
MC Int 467
MC Float 479
MC Mixed 478
71% 475 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000D
Nvidia(10DE 0914) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
8.09% Terrible
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 20.1
7% 22 fps
MRender 20.3
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 19.6
9% 21.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.09%
Great: 8%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
42GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 123%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$150
33GB free
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 491
Write 360
Mixed 385
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 31
115% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 89.1
93% 153 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$28
38GB free
Firmware: 1H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 78.8
Write 74.8
Mixed 90.2
62% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.32
88% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M391B5273DH0- M391B5273DH0- M391B5273DH0- M391B5273DH0- M391B5273DH0- Micron 18KSF51272AZ- M391B5273DH0- M391B5273DH0- 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 33.3
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $113
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $41
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback