Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
12 days ago, 12 days ago, 11 days ago, 10 days ago, 9 days ago, 8 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 3 days ago, 3 days ago, 3 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 1 day ago, 1 day ago, 1 day ago, 1 day ago, 1 day ago, 20 hrs ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130218
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 13 '17 at 11:56
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-2600K-$410
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
70% Good
SC Int 96
SC Float 96.5
SC Mixed 96
77% 96.2 Pts
QC Int 348
QC Float 364
QC Mixed 352
80% 354 Pts
MC Int 457
MC Float 472
MC Mixed 472
70% 467 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Gainward(10B0 0801) 1.2GB
CLim: 750 MHz, MLim: 975 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 99.6
Parallax 89.5
24% 87.6 fps
MRender 80.7
Gravity 63
Splatting 59.3
28% 67.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 30%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$98
143GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ !4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 516
Write 415
Mixed 422
100% 451 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 28.8
109% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 82.3
DQ Mixed 57.8
68% 122 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 116%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$99
15GB free
Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port
44.7% Average
Read 258
Write 123
Mixed 172
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 15.1
67% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 48.6
65% 119 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT51264BD160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $853
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $98
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $220Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $163SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $842SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $180SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback