Toshiba SATELLITE L50-A-1D9

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L50-A-1D9 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA VG10S
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140919
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '17 at 11:46
Run Duration	89 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	13%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39 33,019 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	61.7% Good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 71.6 2-Core 137 62% 99.4 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 199 27% 199 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M 15,605 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Toshiba(1179 FA47) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7654 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	6.19% Terrible	Lighting 7.53 Reflection 8.04 Parallax 9.09 6% 8.22 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 8.53 Splatting 8.87 6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.19% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8385 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4134 (B1) Unknown 97 97 75 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 56 48 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15491567611	84.3% Excellent	Read 511 Write 479 Mixed 476 109% 488 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 68.1 4K Mixed 21.3 108% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 31.7 DQ Write 77.3 DQ Mixed 21 26% 43.4 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair SODIM DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB 973 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	56.1% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 17.5 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 19.1 46% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE L50-A-1D9 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L50-A-1D9

CPU
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	1x

RAM
CT51264BF160BJ.M8F 2x4GBCrucialBench 44%, 779 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $39

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba SATELLITE L50-A-1D9

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L50-A-1D9

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)