User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemDefault Default string
MotherboardAMI Cherry Trail CR
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '17 at 11:17
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
SC Int 25.6
SC Float 15.7
SC Mixed 19.4
16% 20.2 Pts
QC Int 62.4
QC Float 38.3
QC Mixed 48.1
11% 49.6 Pts
MC Int 65.9
MC Float 46.4
MC Mixed 58.7
9% 57 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 16%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 2.8
1% 2.1 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 3
Splatting 3.5
1% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung CJNB4R 63GB
19GB free
Firmware: 0.7
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.5% Very poor
Read 135
Write 61.7
Mixed 108
22% 102 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 4.52
31% 9.49 MB/s
DQ Read 42.1
DQ Write 23.9
DQ Mixed 4.28
11% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2.2
6% 2.23 GB/s
Latency 360
11% 360 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10%
Great: 32%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $245AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
Intel Core i5-7600K $210Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback