Fujitsu CELSIUS M / W

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M / W (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2156-A1
Memory	0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060508
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '17 at 10:41
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 3.20GHz-$100 938 User benchmarks, average bench 31% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	30.8% Below average	Memory 55.2 1-Core 24.5 2-Core 36 28% 38.6 Pts	4-Core 39.5 8-Core 43.3 5% 41.4 Pts	64-Core 47.2 3% 47.2 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 37%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3808110AS 80GB-$33 4,823 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 63GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 94 133195487 (03) Spinup time 100 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1826 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 232844965 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13217 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1828 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 56 606339108 (C2) HDA temperature 36 44 42949672996 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 49 46 136684900 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	35.5% Below average	Read 59 Write 64.5 Mixed 57.2 45% 60.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.31 77% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 41%
Seagate ST3808110AS 80GB-$33 4,823 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 91 108030732 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2198 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 271191868 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 12054 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2210 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 56 740294697 (C2) HDA temperature 41 44 73014444073 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 67 46 168417397 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	33.5% Below average	Read 58 Write 58.6 Mixed 21.6 34% 46.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.24 66% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 41%
Seagate ST380013AS 80GB-$75 2,837 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 30GB free Firmware: 3.00 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 67 48 56656185 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2489 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 359142905 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 19036 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2284 (C2) HDA temperature 37 47 34359738405 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 67 47 56656185 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	27.3% Poor	Read 45.5 Write 49.3 Mixed 26 30% 40.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.44 100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x0.5GB 2,291 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 4 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	12% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.67 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 19%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Fujitsu CELSIUS M / W

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)