Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z270M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '17 at 10:08
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Memory 93.8 1-Core 142 2-Core 273 94% 170 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 713 75% 599 Pts	64-Core 775 48% 775 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Lighting 39.4 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 37.2 32% 35.9 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 37.4 Splatting 35.8 30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 33%
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 362A) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.94% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 1.94 2% 2.34 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 2.04 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.94% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GSSD230S 128GB 2,263 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1025F8 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 18 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 35 (A3) Unknown 100 100 8 (A4) Unknown 100 100 181 (A5) Unknown 100 100 2 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (94) Unknown 100 100 385 (95) Unknown 100 100 17 (96) Unknown 100 100 0 (97) Unknown 100 100 11 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 51 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1108 (F2) Unknown 100 100 521 (F5) Unknown 100 100 1448	102% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 428 Mixed 450 103% 461 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 36.6 148% 56.9 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 50.1 90% 171 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 110%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 196 156 5166 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14991 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13300 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8078 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 94 4296802337 (BE) vendor-specific 73 49 471203867 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 165 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 14825 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	49% Average	Read 90.2 Write 80.5 Mixed 76.1 62% 82.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.25 75% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 63%
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB 1,396 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 242GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 35.5 Mixed 8.48 32% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.13 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FB 2x8GB 706 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 21.9 77% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 24.3 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 60.2 66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z270M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	194x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	132x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	130x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	89x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	79x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	48x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	15x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	29x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	25x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $499

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16