Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	86.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '17 at 10:05
Run Duration	389 Seconds
Run User	SYC-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 79 1-Core 116 2-Core 230 79% 142 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 856 78% 655 Pts	64-Core 1,263 78% 1,263 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3307) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 116 Parallax 98.5 88% 107 fps	MRender 99.6 Gravity 102 Splatting 105 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 187GB free Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3014 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 93 (AB) Unknown 100 100 1 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 36 (AE) Unknown 100 100 65 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 62 45 236224249894 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 2 (CE) Flying height 100 100 1 (F6) Unknown 100 100 19296226972 (F7) Unknown 100 100 603036660 (F8) Unknown 100 100 60631018 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1261 (D2) Unknown 100 100 4	60.3% Good	Read 464 Write 309 Mixed 318 80% 364 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 39.8 4K Mixed 9.48 65% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 58.1 DQ Mixed 28.9 39% 71.9 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 95%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 187GB free Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 97 42 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 14 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2961 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 86 (AB) Unknown 100 100 14 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 5 (AE) Unknown 100 100 63 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 52 206159544355 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 14 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 14 (F6) Unknown 100 100 1435575647 (F7) Unknown 100 100 44892645 (F8) Unknown 100 100 24620398 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1248 (D2) Unknown 100 100 260
Poor: 53% Great: 95%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	243% Outstanding	Read 2,881 Write 1,252 Mixed 1,428 406% 1,854 MB/s	4K Read 46 4K Write 70.6 4K Mixed 34.9 152% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 52.3 58% 97.9 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 243% Great: 236%
Seagate ST31000524NS 1TB-$94 5,596 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 916GB free Firmware: SN11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 82 63 174770741 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1662 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 18 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 597629775 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12942 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 187 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 1 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 69 62 522059807 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 151 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1670 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 77309411359 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 46 16 174770741 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	54.7% Above average	Read 94.9 Write 95.9 Mixed 99.7 73% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.23 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.38 72% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 75%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250 11,608 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 916GB free Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 100 50371367 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1128 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 60 60 1185899 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2358 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 47 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 12885098500 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 58 488308765 (C2) HDA temperature 29 42 73014444061 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 23 21 50371367 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 140479790319840 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2750367329 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2467519989	60.4% Good	Read 110 Write 101 Mixed 89.9 75% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.25 4K Write 0.61 4K Mixed 0.37 63% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 15,750 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 11GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	5.75% Terrible	Read 27.4 Write 4.25 Mixed 6.18 12% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.51 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.004 13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.75% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3000C15 2x16GB 6,222 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	MC Read 37.3 MC Write 34.3 MC Mixed 33.1 100% 34.9 GB/s	SC Read 24.9 SC Write 36.7 SC Mixed 29 86% 30.2 GB/s	Latency 82.4 48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	87x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16