Asus H87M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus H87M-E  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 13 '17 at 09:35
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-4670-$263
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
65% Good
SC Int 102
SC Float 99.4
SC Mixed 99.2
80% 100 Pts
QC Int 319
QC Float 317
QC Mixed 314
72% 317 Pts
MC Int 392
MC Float 389
MC Mixed 394
59% 391 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti-$362
Zotac(19DA 1280) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Lighting 83.4
Reflection 70.4
Parallax 106
28% 86.7 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 79.5
Splatting 54
29% 67.7 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 40%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$97
689GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 136
Write 157
Mixed 148
111% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 5.23
4K Mixed 0.53
191% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$57
569GB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 110
Write 145
Mixed 132
97% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.19
57% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$57
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$57
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$57
336GB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 163
Mixed 143
118% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.31
99% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$9
10GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 93.5
Write 15.2
Mixed 19.6
39% 42.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.03
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.83
102% 2.79 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
49.9% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $108

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $924
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $98
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $220Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $163SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $842SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $180SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback