Lenovo 80U2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemLenovo 80U2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Sofia
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '17 at 09:29
Run Duration101 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium N4200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
35.4% Below average
SC Int 53.7
SC Float 49.7
SC Mixed 51.6
41% 51.7 Pts
QC Int 201
QC Float 190
QC Mixed 185
44% 192 Pts
MC Int 135
MC Float 126
MC Mixed 128
19% 129 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Legend(17AA 39FB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver.
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
2.89% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 6.5
3% 8.47 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 6
Splatting 9.3
3% 7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.89%
Great: 4%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hynix HCG4a2 63GB
34GB free
Firmware: 10.4
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.2% Below average
Read 264
Write 139
Mixed 183
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 2.94
42% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 38.6
DQ Write 24.6
DQ Mixed 2.79
10% 22 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 41%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 80U2 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 28%
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80U2

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
Intel Core i7-7700K $289Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $335Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $149
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $189AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $129
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $198SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $51Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback