Apple MacBookPro10,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop 28%
Workstation 27%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemApple MacBookPro10,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-C3EC7CD22292981F
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170217
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 13 '17 at 08:27
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-3615QM
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.2% Poor
SC Int 31.1
SC Float 32
SC Mixed 31.8
25% 31.6 Pts
QC Int 95.3
QC Float 100
QC Mixed 113
23% 103 Pts
MC Int 407
MC Float 423
MC Mixed 417
62% 416 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M
Apple(106B 00F2) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1254 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 20
Parallax 32
8% 25.6 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 30.6
Splatting 26.1
12% 27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 11%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Apple SM256E 251GB
73GB free
Firmware: CXM09A1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 461
Write 420
Mixed 439
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 6.52
34% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 10.9
DQ Write 60.4
DQ Mixed 22.6
21% 31.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 55%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MacBookPro10,1 Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 17%
Desktop 47%
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Apple MacBookPro10,1

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $335Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $188AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $146
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $190SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $216SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback