User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.1% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
9 days ago, 9 days ago.
SystemRazer Razer Blade Pro
MotherboardGigabyte Blade
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130520
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 13 '17 at 05:29
Run Duration96 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
65.2% Good
SC Int 93.2
SC Float 94.6
SC Mixed 94.4
75% 94.1 Pts
QC Int 315
QC Float 313
QC Mixed 323
72% 317 Pts
MC Int 424
MC Float 422
MC Mixed 410
63% 419 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Device(1A58 6748) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 36.1
Parallax 20.1
4% 22.4 fps
MRender 18
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 17.1
6% 14.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 6%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD256HAGM-00000 256GB
84GB free
Firmware: DXT4200Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 454
Write 103
Mixed 146
50% 234 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 13.7
94% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 31.4
72% 157 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.8
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 59%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $394Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $98
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $126
Intel Core i5-7600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $163SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $842SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $180SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback