ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 132% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 119% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	EVGA Default string
Motherboard	EVGA 151-HE-E999
Memory	27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170330
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '17 at 22:31
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Memory 97 1-Core 124 2-Core 252 89% 158 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 829 81% 667 Pts	64-Core 993 62% 993 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6796) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 387.92 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Lighting 195 Reflection 211 Parallax 207 159% 204 fps	MRender 133 Gravity 186 Splatting 128 120% 149 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 161GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5332 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2168 (B1) Unknown 99 99 19 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 60 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 84 84 15779 (EB) Unknown 99 99 384 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8267469789	110% Outstanding	Read 519 Write 416 Mixed 423 101% 453 MB/s	4K Read 46 4K Write 76.7 4K Mixed 47.1 171% 56.6 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 113 124% 213 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 134%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 90GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12942 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5100 (B1) Unknown 94 94 215 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 57 24 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 97 97 2123 (EB) Unknown 99 99 934 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15470176987	82.7% Excellent	Read 512 Write 372 Mixed 451 99% 445 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 65.3 4K Mixed 24 102% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 98 DQ Mixed 74.3 87% 156 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 86%
Samsung 850 PRO 512GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 36GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9506 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3726 (B1) Unknown 98 98 17 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 59 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 86 86 14108 (EB) Unknown 99 99 747 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11233438690	117% Outstanding	Read 522 Write 500 Mixed 513 114% 512 MB/s	4K Read 46.2 4K Write 90.7 4K Mixed 42.1 172% 59.7 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 128 139% 237 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 136%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4824 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1851 (B1) Unknown 99 99 55 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 60 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 164 (EB) Unknown 99 99 366 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20532148633
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB 6,863 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 350GB free Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 6 (03) Spinup time 234 233 3300 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10849 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 19483 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7603 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1776 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9072 (C2) HDA temperature 124 108 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5648 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	82.8% Excellent	Read 159 Write 130 Mixed 131 105% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.08 4K Write 2.42 4K Mixed 0.65 162% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 80%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB 7,915 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 67GB free Firmware: 04.04V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 195 194 3208 (04) Start/Stop count 84 84 16008 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 22184 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8498 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1111 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 16008 (C2) HDA temperature 125 106 22 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2987 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.8% Above average	Read 105 Write 96.1 Mixed 94.4 74% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 2.38 4K Mixed 0.58 139% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3000C15 4x8GB 3,965 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	MC Read 44.4 MC Write 45.9 MC Mixed 41 125% 43.8 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 25.3 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 50.2 80% 50.2 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback