User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardRazer Blade
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161206
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 12 '17 at 16:59
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 192
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 539
55% 444 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 674F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8792
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.7% Average
Lighting 58.3
Reflection 66.8
Parallax 54.6
48% 59.9 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 52.9
Splatting 59.6
48% 58.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,989
Write 1,331
Mixed 1,339
344% 1,553 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 28.2
158% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 27.1
91% 201 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 220%
Great: 294%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
65.5% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 20.5
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 21
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback