| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2C (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090601 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 12 '17 at 15:33 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | ISR-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium E6300-$66
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
|
37.8%
Below average
|
37% 56 Pts
|
10% 71.2 Pts
|
4% 70.8 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.69
|
55.1%
Above average
|
56% 67.9 fps
|
53% 64.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
30.5%
Below average
|
31% 138 MB/s
|
52% 18 MB/s
|
12% 24.8 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
|
16.1%
Very poor
|
14% 5.07 GB/s
|
13% 4.53 GB/s
|
34% 117 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-G31M-S2C Builds (Compare 133 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2C
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 15x |
| Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 11x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 10x |
| GeForce 9400 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 12,718 samples | 7x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $118 |