Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 5 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5P  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160613
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 12 '17 at 15:33
Run Duration707 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
75.9% Very good
SC Int 99.4
SC Float 102
SC Mixed 99.1
80% 100 Pts
QC Int 365
QC Float 377
QC Mixed 362
83% 368 Pts
MC Int 718
MC Float 777
MC Mixed 779
113% 758 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 8472) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
34% Below average
Lighting 90.4
Reflection 75.6
Parallax 110
30% 91.9 fps
MRender 78.8
Gravity 104
Splatting 73.6
37% 85.5 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34%
Great: 40%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 180 480GB-$140
139GB free
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 479
Mixed 488
110% 493 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 28.4
121% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 74.7
94% 168 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 110%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$78
87GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ !4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 517
Write 124
Mixed 200
61% 280 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 17
116% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 68.2
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 37.9
46% 77.8 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 72%
Seagate ST8000DM005-2EH1 8TB
359GB free
Firmware: DN02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 91% Great: 126%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
279GB free
Firmware: 04.06A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 10000 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 157
Write 135
Mixed 123
104% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.12
4K Write 4.27
4K Mixed 0.37
167% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 84%
Great: 116%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB
127GB free
Firmware: 03.03V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 10000 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 99.5
Mixed 66.4
65% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 2.91
4K Mixed 0.63
163% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 67%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$39
117GB free
Firmware: CR100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 58
Write 56.6
Mixed 47.8
41% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.38
93% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 46%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$40
146GB free
Firmware: 04.04V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 10000 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 98.4
Mixed 101
76% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.47
134% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 67%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$22
30GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 190
Write 102
Mixed 114
158% 135 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 9.79
4K Mixed 4.7
533% 8.39 MB/s
DQ Read 11.2
DQ Write 9.38
DQ Mixed 4.63
518% 8.41 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 91%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$9
14GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 101
Write 27.7
Mixed 37.2
57% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.74
4K Write 2.41
4K Mixed 1.37
154% 3.51 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 44%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 8GB
7GB free, PID 1643
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
6.7% Terrible
Read 25.7
Write 5.07
Mixed 7.32
12% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.85
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.007
30% 2.62 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.7%
Great: 8%
LEXAR JD TRAVELER 0GB
0GB free, PID a411
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.73% Terrible
Read 5.24
Write 4.62
Mixed 4.86
6% 4.91 MB/s
4K Read 3.41
4K Write 0.05
4K Mixed 0.05
16% 1.17 MB/s
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$196
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
67.3% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 22.1
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 20.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 105%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X99-Gaming 5P Builds (Compare 233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,270
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $87
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $210AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $65
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $51Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $220SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback