| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130315 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 12 '17 at 13:00 |
| Run Duration | 104 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
51.1%
Above average
|
59% 97.9 Pts
|
18% 135 Pts
|
8% 137 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Device(105B 0DCC) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
|
1.6%
Terrible
|
1% 1.55 fps
|
2% 2.43 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
50.3%
Above average
|
65% 86.4 MB/s
|
62% 0.62 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
26.3%
Poor
|
24% 8.43 GB/s
|
21% 7.5 GB/s
|
50% 80.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M Builds (Compare 67 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 9x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 7x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 5x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 4x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $342 |