Toshiba PORTEGE Z30-A

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 75% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Toshiba PORTEGE Z30-A (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PORTEGE Z30-A
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150902
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '17 at 06:04
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	75%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4300U 36,631 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket BGA1168, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 89.2 1-Core 82.2 2-Core 138 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 204 28% 205 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 0005) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.84% Terrible	Lighting 3.17 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 5.06 3% 4.04 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 5.74 3% 3.85 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.84% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ128GMCT 128GB 224 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: JTT10101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4289 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1545 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 189 189 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 66 (C2) HDA temperature 61 45 236224053287 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	80.3% Excellent	Read 502 Write 450 Mixed 488 107% 480 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 70 4K Mixed 21.4 102% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 26.5 DQ Write 80.7 DQ Mixed 23.9 27% 43.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 8.8 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 10.3 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 68.3 59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PORTEGE Z30-A Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba PORTEGE Z30-A

CPU
Core i7-4600UIntelBench 49%, 26,548 samples	95x
Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples	64x
Core i5-4200UIntel $281Bench 43%, 64,450 samples	31x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	278x

SSD
HG6 mSATA 128GBToshibaBench 71%, 3,217 samples	36x
HG6 mSATA 256GBToshibaBench 75%, 1,754 samples	32x
THNSNJ256GMCT 256GBToshibaBench 74%, 368 samples	30x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	114x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	66x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16