IBM 2525D2S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	IBM 2525D2S (all builds)
Motherboard	IBM 2525D2S
Memory	1.1 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060314
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '17 at 02:16
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	VEN-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium M processor 1.60GHz 163 User benchmarks, average bench 25% None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	27.4% Poor	Memory 53.1 1-Core 12.3 2-Core 12.2 22% 25.9 Pts	4-Core 12.7 8-Core 12.9 2% 12.8 Pts	64-Core 13.3 1% 13.3 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTC426040G9AT00 40GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 00P4A0B5 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2399 (05) Reallocated sector count 97 97 56 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 511 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 58 58 1287517 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2220 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 94 4288802559 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 434 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 55 55 4589172829747 (C2) HDA temperature 100 74 64427982887 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 70 696 (C4) Reallocation count 95 95 56 (C5) Current pending sector count 87 84 13 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 60 60 1222869 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 1 522	10% Very poor	Read 16.8 Write 17.9 Mixed 8.79 11% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.25 4K Write 0.83 4K Mixed 0.2 48% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 11%
TOSHIBA MK3259GSX 320GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 24GB free, PID 70f1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 24.3 Mixed 6.84 22% 19.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.14 16% 0.24 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 512, 2048 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	6.84% Terrible	MC Read 2.1 MC Write 1.7 MC Mixed 1.6 5% 1.8 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 1.2 5% 1.63 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.84% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

IBM 2525D2S

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)