Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 9,056 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Memory 21.6 1-Core 16.5 2-Core 33.3 15% 23.8 Pts	4-Core 44.9 8-Core 52.8 6% 48.8 Pts	64-Core 52.2 3% 52.2 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4380 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.02% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 1.66 1% 1.38 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 1.87 1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.02% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung DJNB4R 125GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.7 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.5% Poor	Read 135 Write 114 Mixed 131 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 4.77 38% 12.6 MB/s	DQ Read 40.8 DQ Write 21.4 DQ Mixed 4.74 11% 22.3 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 39%
Lexar WorkflowD512 512GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 108GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 37.7 Write 41.3 Mixed 38.1 29% 39 MB/s	4K Read 6.44 4K Write 7.21 4K Mixed 1.52 571% 5.06 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 1x4GB 8,928 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	12% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 3.6 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 1.6 7% 2.57 GB/s	Latency 309 13% 309 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16