To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090707
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 09 '17 at 16:57
Run Duration432 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual E2140-$80
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Memory 67.7
1-Core 16.6
2-Core 26.8
29% 37 Pts
4-Core 23.1
8-Core 28.1
3% 25.6 Pts
64-Core 25.5
2% 25.5 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
EVGA(3842 C958) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
0.89% Terrible
Lighting 0.17
Reflection 3
Parallax 0.72
0% 1.3 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 2.78
2% 2.91 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01E04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 45.1
Write 41.6
Mixed 30.6
29% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.09
4K Write 0.43
4K Mixed 0.11
24% 0.21 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 33%
Seagate ST3160812A 160GB
2GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 46.4
Write 37.6
Mixed 24.1
27% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 39%
HGST HCC 545050A7E380 500GB
234GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1.57
1% 1.57 MB/s
Mass Storage Device 2GB
2GB free, PID 125d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Read 13.8
Write 7.22
Mixed 9.16
12% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.79
4K Write 0.06
4K Mixed 0.06
18% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.94% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 1.9
MC Mixed 2.6
6% 2.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.2
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.94%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback