Asus X99-A II

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	83% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A II (all builds)
Memory	60 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161108
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '17 at 20:49
Run Duration	234 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Memory 95.6 1-Core 126 2-Core 252 89% 158 Pts	4-Core 508 8-Core 919 86% 713 Pts	64-Core 1354 84% 1354 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4995) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing below potential (80^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 113 Parallax 102 86% 107 fps	MRender 93.6 Gravity 96.8 Splatting 91.4 77% 93.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 417GB free Firmware: M0CR011 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1690 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 681 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 79 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 68 58 180389478432 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 1903000190 (F7) Unknown 100 100 59532860 (F8) Unknown 100 100 4150519 (B4) Unknown 0 0 3574 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	74.5% Very good	Read 476 Write 338 Mixed 339 85% 384 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 40.4 4K Mixed 21.7 83% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 47.6 80% 158 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 104%
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89 9,651 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 110GB free Firmware: 4PC10365 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6558 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3744 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 578 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 90 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 406161 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 5542217 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 3 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 393469 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 406161 (F2) Unknown 100 100 405291	43% Average	Read 261 Write 134 Mixed 170 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 15.3 65% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 62.9 DQ Mixed 31.6 44% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 48%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1811 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 683 (B1) Unknown 99 99 29 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 59 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 76 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9851560100	102% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 493 Mixed 511 113% 507 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 60.7 4K Mixed 35.6 122% 41.9 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 122 138% 233 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 124%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 53GB free Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	238% Outstanding	Read 2,117 Write 1,463 Mixed 1,710 392% 1,763 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 70.5 4K Mixed 44.5 150% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 471 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 165 188% 324 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 238% Great: 283%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 287GB free Firmware: MN6OA5Q0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 100 82 (03) Spinup time 134 100 34387788203 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 11797 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 135 100 26 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 13039 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3738 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 93 8903631700295 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 57 471793695 (C0) Power-off retract count 91 91 11805 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 11805 (C2) HDA temperature 193 139 184684380191 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	62.3% Good	Read 110 Write 107 Mixed 77.5 73% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.33 86% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 85%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB 4,330 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 68GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 118 Write 39.2 Mixed 118 110% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.81 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.9 102% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB-$351 1,197 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	142% Outstanding	MC Read 58.8 MC Write 58.9 MC Mixed 51.8 161% 56.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 23.2 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 55.2 72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 172%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	694x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	194x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	189x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	213x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	180x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	108x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	67x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	63x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	40x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	29x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $906

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16