Lenovo 254127G

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Lenovo 254127G (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 254127G
Memory	7.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '17 at 08:48
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 940-$79 592 User benchmarks, average bench 60% None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 74.3 2-Core 122 61% 95.9 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 268 31% 240 Pts	64-Core 268 17% 268 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 2800M 1,135 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 214F) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.0 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	5.81% Terrible	Lighting 7.67 Reflection 8.46 Parallax 2.47 6% 6.2 fps	MRender 7.33 Gravity 5.67 Splatting 5.52 5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.81% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2750 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 843 (B1) Unknown 99 99 16 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 58 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 54 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8666955310	49.8% Average	Read 263 Write 194 Mixed 208 49% 222 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 22.3 4K Mixed 18.9 66% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 93.7 88% 138 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 124%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1.5TB 1,782 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 745GB free Firmware: 1.0. Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Read 150 Write 162 Mixed 147 115% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 3.34 4K Mixed 0.3 108% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 189%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ACR256X64D3S1333C9 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 0198 ACR256X64D3S1333C9 0198 ACR256X64D3S1333C9 10GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1334, 1600, 1334, 1334 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.4% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 7.5 24% 8.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 9.6 28% 9.8 GB/s	Latency 65.1 61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 254127G Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 254127G

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro FX 2800MNvidiaBench 5%, 1,135 samples	2x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 80AD HMT325S6BFR8C-G7 029E CMSO4GX3M1A1333C9 029E CMSO4GX3M1A1333C9 12GBUnknownBench 34%, 1 sample	1x
99U5428-046.A00LF 2x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 176 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $274

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16