Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime8 Days
Run DateOct 07 '17 at 18:47
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 94.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 217
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 724
72% 584 Pts
64-Core 869
54% 869 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 76.4
Reflection 76.4
Parallax 66.2
62% 73 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 72.2
58% 71 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
736GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 510
Write 412
Mixed 420
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 24.4
141% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 41
DQ Write 86.7
DQ Mixed 24.2
30% 50.7 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
384GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,377
Write 937
Mixed 1,003
245% 1,106 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 24
164% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 400
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 22
110% 252 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 176%
Great: 254%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,606
Write 1,068
Mixed 1,127
281% 1,267 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 23.3
168% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 46.4
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 23.5
32% 57.4 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 181%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
174GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 497
Mixed 509
114% 508 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 21.9
126% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 22.2
80% 172 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 116%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
128GB free
Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 509
Write 248
Mixed 272
75% 343 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 12
102% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 27.8
DQ Write 88.7
DQ Mixed 11.9
22% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 166
Mixed 156
125% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.23
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.26
119% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2800 C14 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2801 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 49.3
MC Write 44.7
MC Mixed 49.5
137% 47.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 22.9
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 122%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $290

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,571
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback