Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC)  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170922
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 07 '17 at 13:52
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 238
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 737
69% 576 Pts
64-Core 938
58% 938 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.9.3
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.6% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 65.8
Parallax 88.6
52% 72.9 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 67.4
Splatting 58.1
53% 65.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM001B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 517
Write 508
Mixed 508
114% 511 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 14.1
80% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 14.4
39% 84.3 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 111%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
137GB free
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2,692
Write 1,265
Mixed 1,393
391% 1,783 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 37.1
152% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 62.6
67% 113 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 237%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 181
Mixed 177
138% 184 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.31
96% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
931GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 180
Mixed 156
132% 177 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.28
93% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
876GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 143
Write 123
Mixed 123
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.27
4K Mixed 0.51
134% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 76%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
389GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 90
Write 80
Mixed 82.8
64% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.32
78% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 54%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
319GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 130
Write 119
Mixed 122
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.15
4K Write 3.03
4K Mixed 0.7
182% 1.62 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 34.7
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 28.7
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC) Builds (Compare 459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $549
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback