Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170801
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 07 '17 at 03:59
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 75.4 1-Core 113 2-Core 225 76% 138 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 752 73% 598 Pts	64-Core 938 58% 938 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 82%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 852D) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.14% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.54 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.41 fps	MRender 2.71 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.83 2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.14% Great: 1%
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 14,881 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	6.97% Terrible	Lighting 9.43 Reflection 9.23 Parallax 3.34 8% 7.34 fps	MRender 7.95 Gravity 6.67 Splatting 6.17 6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.97% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 525ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 6661942 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 -53180285052118 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1428 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 893 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 26 54 55838113818 (C2) HDA temperature 26 54 55838113818 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 6661942 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 6661942 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 6661942 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 14996 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8161 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8161 (F2) Unknown 0 0 7253	39.7% Below average	Read 160 Write 93.1 Mixed 100 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 85.3 4K Mixed 9.07 90% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 20 DQ Write 81.5 DQ Mixed 7.72 18% 36.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80 27,325 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 464GB free Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 174660985 (03) Spinup time 95 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1211 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 39 38 48026415481848 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 5082 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 12 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1186 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 94 47245361165 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 72 57 471531548 (C2) HDA temperature 28 43 55834574876 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 39 17 174660985 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 11	60.1% Good	Read 106 Write 103 Mixed 94.2 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.44 111% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB 7,485 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	MC Read 33.9 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 28.7 90% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 32.2 SC Mixed 25.1 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 89.6 45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)