ADD TO PC
BUILD

Phoenix/sis M7X0SU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Phoenix/sis M7X0SU (all builds)
Motherboard	SiS M7X0SU
Memory	2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	27920515
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '17 at 21:37
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5750-$99 2,050 User benchmarks, average bench 32% uPGA 479M, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Memory 48.8 1-Core 22.8 2-Core 44.6 26% 38.7 Pts	4-Core 45.4 8-Core 45.2 6% 45.3 Pts	64-Core 44.8 3% 44.8 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9300M GS 2,044 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Clevo(1558 0802) 256MB Driver: nvd3dum Ver. 7.15.11.7609 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.96% Terrible	Lighting 0.33 Reflection 1.35 Parallax 0.28 0% 0.65 fps	MRender 1.52 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 5.39 2% 2.44 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.96% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2552GSX 250GB-$47 2,386 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: LV010A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1554 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 12808 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 310 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 15544 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 12613 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 257 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 74 74 269846 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 240519020575 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 285 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 12629 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 8298 (DE) Loaded hours 70 70 12371 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 320 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	27.4% Poor	Read 42.8 Write 52.5 Mixed 19.6 28% 38.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.21 54% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 31%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 536GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 25.5 Write 20.6 Mixed 14.3 24% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.17 60% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DRAM Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 2.6 9% 3 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback