Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3060 20,242 User benchmarks, average bench 18% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	25% Poor	Memory 41.8 1-Core 24.5 2-Core 48.1 25% 38.1 Pts	4-Core 49.4 8-Core 48.5 7% 49 Pts	64-Core 48.8 3% 48.8 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1C4D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.59% Terrible	Lighting 1.63 Reflection 2.73 Parallax 2.41 1% 2.26 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 3.13 2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.59% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hynix HBG4a2 31GB 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10.4 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.1% Poor	Read 151 Write 39.1 Mixed 69.5 19% 86.7 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 28.5 4K Mixed 2.98 54% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 48.6 DQ Write 37.9 DQ Mixed 3.22 13% 29.9 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT425S6CFR6A-PB 1x2GB 2,027 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (78^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 5.5 17% 6.07 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 194 21% 194 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 11%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	2x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	2x

SSD
PM871b M.2 2280 128GBSamsungBench 83%, 2,851 samples	1x
SD8SNAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 56%, 12,768 samples	1x

RAM
HMT425S6CFR6A-PB 1x2GBHynixBench 15%, 2,027 samples	1x
4KTF51264HZ-1G6A1 1x4GBMicronBench 17%, 341 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16