| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | ECS H67H2-M3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20101214 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 05 '17 at 19:49 |
| Run Duration | 89 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 77% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.2%
Good
|
67% 111 Pts
|
37% 280 Pts
|
19% 306 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.44
|
1.33%
Terrible
|
1% 1.61 fps
|
2% 2.38 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
44.7%
Average
|
58% 76.5 MB/s
|
67% 0.59 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
28.8%
Poor
|
25% 8.8 GB/s
|
26% 8.93 GB/s
|
62% 64.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H67H2-M3 Builds (Compare 49 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: ECS H67H2-M3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 14x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 6x |
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 8x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 7x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $384 |