| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock X99M Extreme4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160816 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 05 '17 at 18:01 |
| Run Duration | 1092 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.7%
Very good
|
72% 124 Pts
|
56% 462 Pts
|
48% 776 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8555) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.9%
Poor
|
25% 29.3 fps
|
25% 30.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$199
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
34.9%
Below average
|
73% 328 MB/s
|
1% 0.51 MB/s
| |
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Samsung S2 Portable 3 1TB
68GB free, PID 60a8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
||||
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 80 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock X99M Extreme4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 38x |
| Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 8x |
| Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 9x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 9x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $489 |