ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	. .
Motherboard	http://www.abit.com.tw/ IP35 Pro(Intel P35-ICH9R)
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080526
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '17 at 16:46
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110 5,335 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	53.3% Above average	Memory 76.2 1-Core 45.6 2-Core 91.3 46% 71 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 178 24% 179 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 36CA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Lighting 23.7 Reflection 17.5 Parallax 20.9 19% 20.7 fps	MRender 25.8 Gravity 24.4 Splatting 17.5 18% 22.6 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 92797064300295 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2576 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2575 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2575 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 409013 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 57 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 409013 (F2) Unknown 100 100 542603 (F9) Unknown 100 100 11240
Poor: 58% Great: 95%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB 6,005 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1TB free Firmware: 01.00101 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 40 40 15000 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11867 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 14152 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4280 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 693 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 117 117 251441 (C2) HDA temperature 127 100 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 196 196 1454 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 196 196 1408 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 166 47 6924	72.4% Very good	Read 141 Write 111 Mixed 77 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 2.97 4K Mixed 0.37 128% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 83%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 543GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 186 160 5658 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10536 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 18477 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5135 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 315 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10536 (C2) HDA temperature 126 105 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48.3% Average	Read 82.8 Write 85.3 Mixed 18.3 45% 62.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.29 90% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 51%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 250GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 177 7891 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12494 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 20815 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5571 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 947 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 167 167 100102 (C2) HDA temperature 130 102 22 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	30.3% Below average	Read 52.5 Write 52.7 Mixed 24.2 32% 43.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 2.29 4K Mixed 0.35 106% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	23% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 6.7 20% 7.17 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 7.5 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 87.9 46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback